About ICS

The Institute of Communication Studies is a leading research organization in the field of journalism and media studies, public relations and corporate communications. Our mission is to contribute towards strengthening of Macedonian democracy by working with media, civil society and public institutions, educating a critical public that will ask for greater transparency and accountability through engagement in the policy creation process.


In Defense of Dignity

In a world filled with increasing awareness and understanding about autism and related neurological conditions, it is deeply disheartening and concerning to come across remarks that not only showcase ignorance but also perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Ranko Srbakoski’s comments, referring to people with autism as “sick and retarded” are not only derogatory and misleading but also reflect a dangerous perspective that we, as a society, should wholly reject.

Rather than fostering empathy and inclusivity, such remarks segregate and alienate a significant portion of our community. It is the kind of language that can harm a child’s self-worth, impede their growth, and stigmatize them in the eyes of society. It also reflects poorly on the person uttering such statements, painting them as someone unwilling to learn, understand, or empathize with those different from them.

When people use harmful language publicly, they inadvertently give permission for others to do the same, causing ripple effects of prejudice and intolerance. By understanding the weight of our words, we can help create a more inclusive world where children, regardless of their neurological status, feel valued and accepted.

Condemning these remarks is not about suppressing freedom of speech but about safeguarding the dignity of those who cannot always defend themselves against hurtful and misguided perceptions.

Words matter. They shape our perceptions, beliefs, and actions. Ranko Srbakoski’s comments do not represent the kind of society we aspire to be – one that is inclusive, accepting, and understanding of all its members. We must do better, and it starts by challenging and rejecting such damaging viewpoints.


This article was produced within the Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 project, funded by the European Union.